CLIMATE FUND (UN)
COPENHAGEN TALKS PROPOSE SETTING UP A LARGE RESERVE FUND TO HELP SO CALLED POORER COUNTRIES ADAPT TO CLIMATE CHANGE ...THERE ARE MANY WORTHWHILE LEGITIMITE REASONS FOR THIS TYPE OF FUND...BUT FOR ME I WOULD BE WARY OF SUCH A FUND TO REFURBISH/BUILD NUCLEAR REACTORS AS A POSSIBLE "CURE" FOR CLIMATE CHANGE...WHICH IT DEFINITELY IS NOT...IT WILL MAKE CLIMATE PROBLEMS WORSE..DUE TO INCREASED (CO2)POLLUTION IN THE COMPLETE LIFE CYCLE OF A REACTOR WHICH MUST INCLUDE URANIUM MINING AND DECOMISSION ,RADIATION HAZARDS TO PLANTS,ANIMALS,LEAKAGE OF TOXIC DUST AND WATER,AND OVER USE OF WATER RESOURCES AND VERY,VERY EXPENSIVE TAX FUNDED PASSED TO COSUMERS.....MUCH BETTER COST EFFECTIVE WAY IS TO AGRESSIVELY EDUCATE PUBLIC ABOUT CONSERVATION AND EFFIENCY..IN THE DAYS LEADING TO COPENHAGEN PLEASE TRY AND PREVENT THIS BIG LOOPHOLE TO BE ABUSED BY COUNTRIES WHO WILL USE THIS FUND FOR NUCLEAR EXPANSION.WE DON'T WANT TO MAKE THE CLIMATE SITUATION WORSE...NOTE: IN THE ABOVE PHOTO OF A REACTOR,WATER SUPPLY IS EVIDENT...HUGE AMOUNTS OF WATER ARE NECESSARY BOTH FOR STEAM GENERATION AND FOR LARGE COOLING POOLS...AS GLOBAL WARMING ADVANCES THIS WATER WILL BE NEEDED FOR AGRICULTURE AND DRINKING PURPOSES,ETC.,ETC..SO WE SHOULD NOT SACRIFICE OUR DRINKING WATER FOR A NUCLEAR INDUSTRY THAT WILL DEPLETE OUR RESOURCES.
Comments