NO TO NUKES

. . .. . . . . LOS ANGELES TIMES NEWS ARTICLE(A-MUST-READ)... . .

No to nukes

It's tempting to turn to nuclear plants to combat climate change, but alternatives are safer and cheaper.
July 23, 2007

JAPAN SEES NUCLEAR POWER as a solution to global warming, but it's paying a price. Last week, a magnitude 6.8 earthquake caused dozens of problems at the world's biggest nuclear plant, leading to releases of radioactive elements into the air and ocean and an indefinite shutdown. Government and company officials initially downplayed the incident and stuck to the official line that the country's nuclear plants are earthquake-proof, but they gave way in the face of overwhelming evidence to the contrary. Japan has a sordid history of serious nuclear accidents or spills followed by cover-ups.

It isn't alone. The U.S. government allows nuclear plants to operate under a level of secrecy usually reserved for the national security apparatus. Last year, for example, about nine gallons of highly enriched uranium spilled at a processing plant in Tennessee, forming a puddle a few feet from an elevator shaft. Had it dripped into the shaft, it might have formed a critical mass sufficient for a chain reaction, releasing enough radiation to kill or burn workers nearby. A report on the accident from the Nuclear Regulatory Commission was hidden from the public, and only came to light because one of the commissioners wrote a memo on it that became part of the public record. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .THE ABOVE IS FROM A LOS-ANGELES TIMES ARTICLE THAT GOES INTO GREAT DETAIL ABOUT THE SUBJECT OF NUCLEAR POWER AS A CURE FOR GLOBAL WARMING AND OUR ISATIABLE NEED (?) FOR MORE AND MORE ELECTRICAL POWER.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NUCLEAR=WATER HOG

tar sands protest,washington dc

WALMART UN-PATRIOTIC